The Pros and Cons of Microservices
August 25, 2020

Rod Cope
Perforce

Microservices have changed software development and promise powerful benefits. Instead of traditional monolithic architectures, individual teams create small pieces of functionality, which are then added up to be the whole. These smaller pieces are easier to replace, and years have not been dedicated to creating a particular microservice and being locked into one platform.

Also, it is theoretically easier to be innovative and responsive, and to scale up to meet additional user load or demand, compared to a monolithic app, where the entire architecture essentially has to be cloned (another copy of the database, the web server and the app server).

Microservices fit in well with open source, largely because microservices depend on container orchestration tools, which happen to be open source, and many related tools — such as service meshes — are predominantly open source packages.

The Pros and Cons

For some organizations, microservices enable the agility that modern software development needs. However, it is a big step: some organizations have already struggled with Agile and DevOps adoption: microservices are an even bigger challenge. Gartner has previously predicted that the majority of organizations will find microservices too disruptive and will look at alternatives.

To give this some context, here is an example. Imagine an ecommerce app for online checkout, involving pricing, a shipping calculator, and an inventory all working together. Then imagine it is Thanksgiving, and the website is being overwhelmed by enquiries from a particular zip code. With microservices, it is relatively simple to spin up a new instance to handle the extra load, compared to a monolith, which would require another instance of the entire app.

However, the amount of effort to coordinate all of the moving parts can increase dramatically. To work in harmony, microservices need continual monitoring and a view of the bigger picture. While they are loosely coupled, in fact microservices may depend on a couple of others to perform well. So, if a version changes, there must be a way to notify related microservices teams, but without creating a lock-step situation. Service meshes can help make systems more resilient, but even so, microservices can easily lead to uncontrollable chaos if not planned appropriately.

Alternatives to Microservices

An alternative approach is macroservices, using chunks of previously-proven parts of the monolith, but bring legacy problems. These include code that is hard to read, or it may be difficult to get a workable public API, and testing and scaling-up may be challenging.

Another option is to use miniservices, where two or three share the same database, unlike microservices which each have their own data storage. Miniservices are independent but coordinated. There is the downside risk of "miniservices creep," caused by teams adding more shared data stores, APIs, and other features. This can lead to a bloated environment, so miniservices need a lot of control from team leaders.

Playing devil's advocate, is a wholesale move away from monoliths always necessary? If new releases are rare, a monolith may be fine for the moment. Agile and DevOps, with some help from REST APIs, can improve efficiency. However, it is likely that for any organization, at some point, a more flexible way of working will become imperative.

Team Culture is Everything

The bottom line is that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to modern software architectures; each have their pros and cons. Furthermore, the importance of the cultural approach outweighs the choice of architecture. Failure might be blamed on microservices, whereas it could have worked with the right team culture. Sure, tools like API management, version control, and automated testing help, but they are not the answer on their own.

An incremental move away from monoliths is another option, perhaps just transitioning the parts of an app that change most often, which will also give the organization some experience of what does — or doesn't — work, before making a bigger commitment to another approach.

New ways of developing software have huge potential for flexibility, innovation, and time-to-market, but regardless of which structure is chosen, the impact on the culture cannot be under-estimated.

Rod Cope is CTO of Perforce
Share this

Industry News

October 03, 2023

Parasoft announced new advancements in its Continuous Quality Platform for functional solutions, which include Parasoft Virtualize, SOAtest, CTP, and DTP.

The latest releases introduce capabilities including:

- GenAI integration for API testing

- Comprehensive microservices code coverage

- Web accessibility testing

- Powerful learning mode for creating and updating virtual assets

These innovations are set to transform the landscape of software testing for enterprise application development and test teams.

October 03, 2023

LinearB announced the release of free DORA Metrics dashboards.

October 03, 2023

PerfectScale, a provider of Kubernetes optimization, has successfully closed $7.1 million in seed funding.

October 02, 2023

Spectro Cloud announced Palette EdgeAI to simplify how organizations deploy and manage AI workloads at scale across simple to complex edge locations, such as retail, healthcare, industrial automation, oil and gas, automotive/connected cars, and more.

September 28, 2023

Kong announced Kong Konnect Dedicated Cloud Gateways, the simplest and most cost-effective way to run Kong Gateways in the cloud fully managed as a service and on enterprise dedicated infrastructure.

September 28, 2023

Sisense unveiled the public preview of Compose SDK for Fusion.

September 28, 2023

Cloudflare announced Hyperdrive to make every local database global. Now developers can easily build globally distributed applications on Cloudflare Workers, the serverless developer platform used by over one million developers, without being constrained by their existing infrastructure.

September 27, 2023

Kong announced full support for Kong Mesh in Konnect, making Kong Konnect an API lifecycle management platform with built-in support for Kong Gateway Enterprise, Kong Ingress Controller and Kong Mesh via a SaaS control plane.

September 27, 2023

Vultr announced the launch of the Vultr GPU Stack and Container Registry to enable global enterprises and digital startups alike to build, test and operationalize artificial intelligence (AI) models at scale — across any region on the globe. \

September 27, 2023

Salt Security expanded its partnership with CrowdStrike by integrating the Salt Security API Protection Platform with the CrowdStrike Falcon® Platform.

September 26, 2023

Progress announced a partnership with Software Improvement Group (SIG), an independent technology and advisory firm for software quality, security and improvement, to help ensure the long-term maintainability and modernization of business-critical applications built on the Progress® OpenEdge® platform.

September 26, 2023

Solace announced a new version of its Solace Event Portal solution that gives organizations with Apache Kafka deployments better visibility into, and control over, their Kafka event streams, brokers and associated assets.

September 26, 2023

Reply launched a proprietary framework for generative AI-based software development, KICODE Reply.

September 26, 2023

Harness announced the industry-wide Engineering Excellence Collective™, an engineering leadership community.

September 25, 2023

Harness announced four new product modules on the Harness platform.