The DevOps Drumbeat - Part 1
October 19, 2015

Jason Bloomberg
Intellyx

What it means to build quality software has taken a beating over the years. We're no longer content to strive for defect-free code. We must also make sure the software meets both its functional and nonfunctional requirements. Only now with the rise of more Agile ways of thinking, we've placed the notion of a software requirement under the microscope, as building flexible, resilient software often trumps checking items off our requirements list.

As a result, the tried and true Project Management Iron Triangle has taken its lumps. We've been trying to bend or rework the Iron Triangle for years, with limited success. Today, thanks to DevOps and Agile Architecture, we finally can.

Adding Corners to the Iron Triangle

You remember the Iron Triangle: vertices at scope, cost, and time. Any project might fix two, but the third must be allowed to vary. Inadvertently fix all three? Then quality suffers – an unacceptable result.


The Iron Triangle

We've tried adding quality to the triangle over the years to let us fix the other three constraints, turning it into the Project Diamond, but that move was a rather academic exercise. After all, you can't go to your boss and say “we delivered on all the requirements on time and on budget, but sorry, it just doesn't work!” People insisted on taking quality as a given, and lived with the triangle as-is.

Other additions to the triangle: The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) added risk to the triangle – helping to expand it to a six-pointed star. Risk, however, is more than a project constraint, as there are many types of risk. In addition to the risk of violating any individual constraint, there are also systemic risks like opening a security hole or violating a regulation. Adding risk, therefore, muddies the purpose of the triangle.

The Agile world also contributed a variation of the triangle with Jim Highsmith's Agile Triangle. Highsmith collapsed all the constraints into a single vertex, and differentiated value from quality to populate the other two corners. Quality, according to Highsmith, represents the current quality of the project while value represents “future quality – ‘can the product continue to deliver value in the future?',” according to Highsmith. He explains: “responding to the unanticipated future requires adaptability, and the key to adaptability is keeping technical debt low.” In other words, software value depends upon its adaptability, and adaptability depends upon lowering technical debt.

Highsmith makes some important points, but by collapsing the traditional Iron Triangle constraints, he doesn't provide a clear explanation for how to balance quality, value, scope, cost, and time – and now with added implicit constraints of adaptability and technical debt, the resulting model isn't all that useful. There is also widespread confusion about the challenges of both inherent flexibility and “good” technical debt (be sure to read my discussion of technical debt, if you haven't already).

Remember that Hightower ties inherent flexibility to value – a critical connection for any Agilist to remember. However, he inadequately addresses the connection between adaptability and technical debt, jumping to the conclusion that keeping technical debt low is always a good thing. In fact, careful and temporary acquisition of technical debt, just like the careful borrowing of money that generated the metaphor – is in reality an essential part of Agile development.

In my 2013 book The Agile Architecture Revolution, I took a different, but similar approach to extending the Iron Triangle by adding agility to the mix as an explicit constraint, turning the triangle into the Agile Architecture (AA) Quality Star below.


The Agile Architecture Quality Star

In the figure above, the traditional Iron Triangle continues to represent the scope/cost/time tradeoff, while an additional triangle – the agility/quality/time Best Effort Triangle – represents a separate tradeoff: the more time you devote to quality, the less agile you become. The point to the AA Quality Star is to elevate agility to the status of a metarequirement and thus a constraint to the project, which in turn requires us to rethink how we deal with quality when agility is a priority.

Beyond The Agile Architecture Quality Star

While Highsmith's value constraint and my agility constraint both recognize that the ability for software to be inherently flexible – that is, the ability to respond to future requirements as well as current ones – is an important added constraint to any software that claims to be Agile, neither of us fully explored the fact that inherent flexibility and resilience are actually two separate constraints. Inherent flexibility supports an organization's desire to be more innovative and responsive, which are two of the three elements of business agility. The third element is resilience: the ability to recover from adverse events.

In the past, we typically took a brute force approach to building resilience into our software by hammering on it until it passed its performance tests and then hoping it wouldn't break in production. Today, however, we have a deeper understanding of resilience, as cloud computing has forced us to rethink how we deal with failure. It's no longer adequate to build software with the goal of preventing failure. Rather, we must build software that automatically recovers from failure. Expecting and planning for failure, including the graceful degradation of functionality should faults develop – what we might call Chaos Monkey Engineering – is an essential part of building software that supports the business agility driver.

Read The DevOps Drumbeat - Part 2

Jason Bloomberg is President of Intellyx.

Share this

Industry News

October 17, 2019

Acquia announced the availability of its new Developer Studio, a suite of tools designed to improve the productivity of Drupal developers.

October 17, 2019

Talend announced Talend Cloud is now available on Microsoft Azure, offering a secure and scalable Integration Platform-as-a-Service for collecting, transforming and cleaning data.

With embedded data quality and native integration performance, Talend Cloud on Microsoft Azure delivers the trusted data companies need to make real-time business decisions, accelerate advanced analytics, and meet regulatory compliance requirements.

October 17, 2019

Cognizant entered into an agreement to acquire Contino, a privately-held technology consulting firm.

October 16, 2019

Red Hat announced Red Hat OpenShift 4.2, the latest version of Red Hat’s enterprise Kubernetes platform designed to deliver a more powerful developer experience.

October 16, 2019

Gluware announced Gluware Automation v3.6, which extends the platform API capabilities including integrations with the Mist and Ansible platforms and introduces lifecycle management and infrastructure integration enhancements.

October 16, 2019

XebiaLabs announced that Wipro has renewed and extended its partnership with XebiaLabs as their Strategic Enterprise DevOps Partner across the globe.

October 15, 2019

Puppet announced enhancements to its current product portfolio and the public beta of a new project focused on providing a simplified continuous deployment workflow.

October 15, 2019

DBmaestro expanded its database automation platform to enable CI/CD and release automation for MySQL, MariaDB and Amazon RDS with DBmaestro DevOps Platform v2019.4.

October 15, 2019

Radware announced the launch of Radware Kubernetes Web Application Firewall (WAF), a comprehensive and highly scalable application security solution for Kubernetes-based environments.

October 10, 2019

CloudBees launched a new partner program that expands ISV partners’ ability to align with CloudBees offerings and the global Jenkins community.

October 08, 2019

Nureva announced a key update to the Jira Software integration with Span Workspace, Nureva’s cloud-based digital canvas for visual planning and collaboration.

October 08, 2019

Fugue announced support for Open Policy Agent (OPA), an open source general-purpose policy engine and language for cloud infrastructure.

October 03, 2019

Redgate announced the launch of SQL Compare v14, the latest version of its industry standard tool for quickly and accurately comparing and deploying SQL Server databases.

October 03, 2019

Harness announced the release of Continuous Insights, a new capability of its CD platform that enables organizations to see clearly into software delivery performance across their engineering and development teams without needing to manually collect, correlate, and report metrics that might take days or weeks.

October 03, 2019

OutSystems and Workato announced a partnership aimed at allowing organizations to rapidly realize innovation, time to value, productivity, and mission-critical objectives through readily available application connectors.