The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 7
November 16, 2017

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the industry – including consultants, analysts, organizations, users and the leading vendors – for their opinions on the best way to foster collaboration between Dev and Ops. Part 7, the final installment, covers IT Operations tools.

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 1

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 2

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 3

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 4

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 5

Start with The Best Way for Dev and Ops to Collaborate - Part 6

SHARED LANGUAGE AND TOOLS AROUND PERFORMANCE

It's critical for developers and operators to speak a common language about the performance of their applications. We often see DevOps teams use performance analysis tools to "greenlight" apps before they go into production. That way, developers can make sure they won't break things in production, and if operators do see issues in production, they can easily work with developers to troubleshoot using the very same tools. Having a shared language and tools around performance dramatically improves DevOps collaboration, especially when performance is complex, such as in multi-tenant Big Data systems.
Chad Carson
Co-Founder of Pepperdata

MONITORING

"CAMS" (Culture, Automation, Measurement and Sharing) has persisted as the DevOps mantra. A good monitoring/performance measurement strategy (a big part of the M) is key in bringing Dev and Ops teams together in solving problems at design and run time. What are attributes of a good monitoring strategy: 1. Agreeable. Have a general agreement on what KPIs matter, how they should be gathered and what to do with the data. Monitoring should not be used for deflecting blame but to unite the team on common goals. 2. Accessible. All of monitoring data is at everyone's disposal. In absence of accessibility you end up with war rooms, with chieftains clinging to their weapons (monitoring silos) 3. Integrated. Every aspect of the system and application have to be built to allow measurement. Monitoring as an afterthought usually fails at scale.
Peco Karayanev
Sr. Product Manager, Riverbed

Do a Google image search for "DevOps" and you'll see dozens of models describing the components that make up a continuous delivery cycle. You'll also notice "monitoring" in all of them. The whole point of continuous delivery is that successively smaller, and therefore faster, releases reduce the amount of code change between versions. Reduced change equals reduced risk. However, as release cycles get faster they require near immediate feedback to know if the release was successful or not. In addition, development and production environments are becoming ever more dynamic, so this feedback must come from equally dynamic monitoring. Monitoring that tells both Development and IT Operations how well the service is performing and its availability profile. Baking pre-defined monitoring criteria into an application will allow Operations teams to implement accurate monitor on Day One, and provide that real-time feedback loop to their Development counterparts. Put simply: Including monitoring standards into the Development criteria for a service allows monitoring to become the feedback mechanism that makes the process continuous.
Adam Bacia
Staff Product Marketing Manager, Zenoss

APM

Leveraging Application Performance Management (APM) integrates OPS & DEV teams by seamlessly pinpointing and communicating the root cause of production issues, meaning faster time-to-resolution. APM tools allow your OPS & DEV teams to effectively speak the same language when it comes to production issues in the wild. Being able to drill down further into application issues allows OPS to identify the root cause of errors and communicate those directly to DEV teams.
Doug McAfee
Solution Engineer, Apica

NETWORK MANAGEMENT TOOLS

With the growth of cloud computing and software-defined networking, it's increasingly important for development and network teams to work closely together. Whether it's troubleshooting slow applications or optimizing the network to support new ways of application access, breaking down IT silos is a must. In fact, a recent survey at NetBrain revealed that 45 percent of network engineers cited the lack of collaboration and coordination across teams as the number one challenge when troubleshooting network problems. To overcome this challenge, critical steps include gaining end-to-end network visibility and automating knowledge-sharing across teams. When everyone has the same view of what's happening on the network and level of information at their fingertips, communication flows more quickly and a richer culture of collaboration ensues.
Grant Ho
SVP, NetBrain

Developers code and test their applications in a perfect network environment. Operations deploy and manage those applications in the production network which could include private, public or hybrid networks. It is at this point that your users discover that the application isn't usable because the production network environment is different to the developer's network. Operations blame development, developers say "it works for me" and your users are frustrated. The good news is that there is an alternative approach that helps Dev and Ops to collaborate and mitigate the risk of failure. It involves using Network Emulation technology to create a virtual test network that is repeatable and controllable and has the same characteristics of the production environment. Now, the development team can build their applications in an environment that accurately reflects the real world network enabling them to identify and resolve any networked application performance issues early in the application lifecycle, so that there are no nasty surprises when Ops take delivery.
Peter White
Operations Director, iTrinegy

Share this

Industry News

July 29, 2021

Couchbase announced the general availability of Couchbase Server 7.

July 29, 2021

Cycloid has unveiled Infra Import, a tool that automatically reverse engineers Terraform Infra-as-Code (IaC) from manually deployed infrastructure.

July 29, 2021

Launchable closed a $9.5 million Series A investment.

July 29, 2021

Rafay Systems announced automation and monitoring enhancements to its flagship Kubernetes Management Cloud (KMC).

July 28, 2021

Progress announced the R2 2021 release of Progress Telerik Test Studio, the enterprise UI test automation platform.

July 28, 2021

Synopsys announced the availability of new Rapid Scan capabilities within the company's Coverity static application security testing (SAST) and Black Duck software composition analysis (SCA) solutions.

July 28, 2021

Bitdefender announced GravityZone Security for Containers, expanding its cloud workload security (CWS) offering with run-time support for containers and Linux kernel independence.

July 28, 2021

Armory announced Armory Enterprise on AWS Quick Starts, automated reference deployments built by Amazon Web Services (AWS) solutions architects and AWS Partners.

July 27, 2021

Katalon introduced Katalon TestOps, an open and comprehensive test orchestration platform designed to help enterprises scale test automation and streamline DevOps pipelines.

July 27, 2021

Digital.ai achieved Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) “In Process” status for an Enterprise Agile Planning (EAP) tool.

July 27, 2021

Aqua Security rolls out the availability of its new Aqua Platform, with a unified console to ease the journey from scanning and visibility to workload protection in cloud native environments.

July 26, 2021

Parallel Agile announced a new version of CodeBot, a low-code MERN stack application generator.

July 26, 2021

Appian unveiled its new Appian Japan regional office.

July 26, 2021

CloudTruth raised $5.25 million in seed funding led by Glasswing Ventures and Gutbrain Ventures, with additional funding from Stage 1 Ventures and York IE.

July 22, 2021

Postman successfully obtained the System and Organization Controls (SOC) 2 Type 2 and SOC 3 Type 2 reports for the Postman API platform, meeting critical industry standards relative to the Trust Services Criteria for security, availability, and confidentiality.