The Governance Mismatch
October 23, 2017

Mark Schwartz
Amazon Web Services

DevOps poses a unique challenge and opportunity for IT governance. Traditionally we have governed IT in terms of projects. We lump a number of requirements, fulfilling a number of business needs, together into a bundle we call a project. We then build a business case for that project, put it through some governance process, perhaps an IT steering committee or some variation on one, to decide whether to allow it to proceed and to give it a place in the company's priorities. Once the project is ongoing, the team conducting it reports on its progress against its objectives, and probably against its planned costs and schedule, and some sort of oversight mechanism is in place to review, and perhaps act on, those results. You could say that our unit of governance is the "project," or that we govern at the granularity of the project. The project is a grouping of requirements, a thing that can be planned, an initiative that begins and ends.

Of course project-oriented governance lends itself to the Waterfall model. A fixed set of requirements; a plan; a Gantt chart; a well-defined series of phases; a result at the end – this is a natural way to treat a conglomeration of requirements that has an approved business case and a committed plan.

DevOps offers us a very different manner of execution. It is flow based, with new requirements being pulled into a pipeline, worked on, and deployed quickly to users: it optimizes the lead time for getting requirements into production by automating the delivery process and by eliminating handoffs between functional silos. Each individual requirement travels its own path to production, as if it were a packet making its way across the Internet. Our unit of execution is the individual user story or task, and with very frequent deployments, DevOps can reach single piece flow.

So we find ourselves in a position where we are governing at the project level yet executing at the individual requirement level – a somewhat disturbing mismatch. The consequence is that we are forced to hold requirements in inventory, so to speak, or plan in large batches of requirements.

In order to make a business case and present an adequately sized business proposal to the steering committee, we still need to assemble a large batch of requirements. In order to report on the status of – what? – something that can have a status, I suppose, we still report on the status of projects. We forego, in other words, the full benefits of DevOps – the ability to work leanly by reducing our batch size.

But how else can we govern? What exactly can a steering committee greenlight, and how does it know how that thing is progressing?

I'd like to suggest that the answer is simple and staring us in the face. Or rather, answers, because I believe there are two approaches. The first is to govern by business objectives. We determine a business objective that will have concrete business outcomes, preferably measurable ones. Then we make a business case – formal or informal – that therobjective is worth investing a particular amount of money in. If we decide that it is, we hand the objective to an empowered team and ask them to start accomplishing it – immediately. Because we are in a DevOps world, they should be able to begin deploying functionality virtually right away. We observe the business results they achieve, determine whether they are worth continued investment, and adjust our plans.

The second alternative is to govern IT investment the way we govern the rest of our company – without a governance process. The IT organization is allocated a budget and expected to make good decisions on how to spend it to accomplish the company's objectives. It is assessed and guided like any other part of the company – let's say that the CEO evaluates the CIO's performance and gives feedback to steer IT's direction. What is evaluated is the business outcome of the IT organization's decisions. The advantage of this approach is that it allows for continual transformation, continuous investments in systems, rather than the periodic, on-again-off-again flow of investment when we organize around projects.

It's one thing to reap operational advantages from DevOps. It is a different thing to maximize the value that DevOps can deliver to the enterprise, strategically as well as tactically. For that, we need to rethink governance.

Mark Schwartz, Enterprise Strategist at Amazon Web Services (AWS), is the Author of "A Seat at the Table"
Share this

Industry News

July 14, 2020

Perfecto by Perforce announced the launch of Android emulators and iOS simulators in its cloud testing platform.

July 14, 2020

SmartBear released new DevOps features in SwaggerHub, the company's API design and documentation platform.

July 14, 2020

Traceable, a new end-to-end application security monitoring platform, launched from stealth today with $20M in series A funding from Unusual Ventures and BIG Labs.

July 13, 2020

Docker announced a collaboration with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to simplify the lives of developers by allowing them to focus on application development, streamlining the process of deploying and managing containers in AWS from their local development environment.

July 13, 2020

Perforce Software announced the release of a combined JRebel and XRebel plugin for the Eclipse IDE.

July 13, 2020

Spectro Cloud announced that its first product—Spectro Cloud—is now generally available.

July 09, 2020

ShiftLeft released a new version of NextGen Static Analysis (NG SAST), including new workflows, purpose-built for developers that significantly improve security, while enhancing productivity.

July 09, 2020

RunSafe Security announced a partnership with JFrog that will enable RunSafe to supercharge binary protections via a simple plugin that JFrog users can deploy within their Artifactory repositories and instantly protect binaries and containers.

July 09, 2020

LeanIX closed $80 million in Series D funding led by new investor Goldman Sachs Growth.

July 08, 2020

Afi.ai introduced Afi Data Platform, a cloud-based replication and resiliency service that helps to monitor, predict downtime and recover K8s applications.

July 08, 2020

D2iQ announced the release of Conductor, a new interactive learning platform that enables enterprises to access hands-on cloud native courses and training.

July 08, 2020

SUSE entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Rancher Labs.

July 07, 2020

Micro Focus announced AI-powered enhancements to the intelligent testing capabilities of the UFT Family, a unified set of solutions designed to reduce the overall complexity of automating the functional testing processes.

July 07, 2020

Push Technology announced the launch of a new Service API capability for Diffusion Cloud, Push’s Real-Time API Management Cloud Platform.

July 07, 2020

Lightrun exited stealth and announced $4M in seed funding for the first complete continuous debugging and observability platform for production applications.