Digital Transformation Blocked by Disconnect Between Business and IT
September 13, 2017

Ronit Eliav
Panaya

IT-Business convergence is needed to deliver continuous change, but many of the current tools add complexity and fail to merge the two, according to the Panaya 2017 State of Functional Testing Report.

Panaya commissioned Spiceworks to survey 154 IT testing decision-makers in the US and the UK, in order to gain insights regarding current practices, trends, challenges and perceptions of business process testing.

According to the survey, the majority (53 percent) of testing leaders believe that making their organizations more agile is critical to defining their testing methodology and two out of three testing leaders surveyed stated that QA and testing are highly important to their organization's overall strategy. Yet the lack of visibility into testing processes and reliable production data is creating a disconnect between IT and the business that is challenging IT's ability to keep up with rapidly changing requirements.


The survey shows that testers' key performance indicators (KPIs) have shifted with "Understanding Business Requirements" seen as most critical to defining test methodology, followed closely by "Improving the Customer Experience" by reducing the amount of software defects. This trend is expected to intensify in the future, as over one third of testing leaders believe that business domain expertise will become a requirement for testers with the growing effects of agile and continuous delivery.

Despite the importance of understanding the business domain, there are gaps in IT organizations' readiness for continuous delivery, as almost half (47 percent) of IT leaders surveyed believe that their tests do not accurately reflect real-life production scenarios. In fact, creating testing scenarios that accurately reflect business processes is currently the top test planning challenge.

The survey findings further demonstrate that while testing decisions and processes are driven by the understanding of business requirements to improve customer experience, 40 percent of respondents claim to be challenged by the lack of business oriented testing reports. In fact, when asked about their top test execution challenges, most testing leaders reported tools that are unfriendly to non-technical testers and require intensive training are hindering successful completion of functional testing.

To make up for lack of preparedness, testers often overtest resulting in wasted resources and unnecessary project delays. Close to one third of testers admit to always testing more than needed to ensure quality.

Dissatisfaction with current solutions and the need for better alternatives can account for the low percentage of organizations (12 percent) relying solely on existing centralized testing solutions, in contrast with the percentage (42 percent) of organizations who have purchased these solutions.

These results are consistent with Gartner's assessment with the state of test automation tools. According to the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Software Test Automation, “There is a growing number of vendors in the test automation market as technology evolves (cloud, mobile, Internet of Things [IoT]), practices change (agile, lean, DevOps) and business moves to utilize technology as part of a digital business disruption to the market. These create opportunities for new and small vendors and new offerings to automate different layers of the release pipeline. Many solutions currently don't meet the criteria of this evaluation."
Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Software Test Automation, 15 November 2016

Ronit Eliav is Director of Product Marketing at Panaya

The Latest

November 15, 2018

Serverless infrastructure environments are set to become the dominant paradigm for enterprise technology deployments, according to a new report — Why the Fuss About Serverless? — released by Leading Edge Forum ...

November 14, 2018

What to automate? Which parts of the delivery process are good candidates? Which applications will benefit from automation? At first, those sound like silly questions. Automate all your repetitive processes. If you think that you'll do the same thing manually more than once, automate it. Why would you waste your creative potential and knowledge by doing things that are much better done by scripts? Yet, an average company does not adhere to that logic. Why is that? ...

November 13, 2018

I'd love to see more security automation deeply integrated into the development process. Everybody knows since the 1990s that security as an afterthought just doesn't work, yet we keep doing it. The reason, I think, is because it's very hard to automate security ...

November 09, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 5, the final installment, covers deployment and production ...

November 08, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 4 is all about security ...

November 07, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 3 covers the development environment and the infrastructure ...

November 06, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 2 covers the coding process ...

November 05, 2018

Everyone talks about automating the software development lifecycle (SDLC) but the first question should be: What should you automate? With this question in mind, DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 1 starts with by-far the most popular recommendation: Testing ...

October 31, 2018

Halloween is a time for all things spooky, but not when it comes to your mobile app experience. A poor experience can not only scare off your customers but keep them away for good ...

October 30, 2018

As organizations have embraced open source, they have become polyglot — using multiple programming languages and technology stacks to accomplish software and hardware related tasks. Enterprises are caught between the benefits provided by a polyglot environment and the complexities and challenges these environments bring. Ultimately, if the situation remains unchecked, polyglot will kill your enterprise ...

Share this