Data Masking as Part of Your GDPR Compliant Security Posture
May 08, 2018

Nick Turner
Zenoss

With data breaches consistently being in the news over the last several years, it is no wonder why data privacy has become such a hot topic and why the European Union (EU) has put in place General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which will become enforceable on May 25, 2018, which is less than a month away!

GDPR applies to any company that collects or processes the personal data of EU data subjects, which could be EU residents or visitors. It regulates how to protect an individual's Personally Identifiable Information (PII), which includes all data that could potentially be used to identify an individual such as their name or e-mail address. And the fines for non-compliance are severe up to 20 million euros or 4% of the worldwide annual revenue of the prior financial year, whichever is higher.

While authorities will be reliant on customers reporting non-compliance and there will be a bigger focus on more serious violations, it is important to identify areas of risk and to take appropriate action. GDPR stresses that software which handles PII follow principles of data protection by design and by default. An appropriated technical and organizational measure to achieve this is with "pseudonymization."

Pseudonymisation is an overarching term for obfuscation approaches like data masking which intends to secure confidential information that directly or indirectly reveal an individual’s identity.

Data masking is the ability to replace or obfuscate sensitive data with a non-sensitive equivalent. So, for example, rather than using credentials that reflect an individual’s name such as "nturner" using something like "xyz9876". Now this approach only works if in the same application that data masking can't indirectly reveal an individual's identity by associating with a captured IP address or e-mail.

Only data that is truly anonymous is exempted from data protection but data that has the potential to reveal identifies is classified as pseudonymized which is still considered personal data. GDPR does incentivize the use of leveraging pseudonymization as part of your security posture to satisfy the design of data protection. In the case of a data breach, if the data is unintelligible to any person who is not authorized to access it then certain notification requirements are no longer required. Additionally, data access requests and disclosure requirements are relaxed when pseudonymization is leveraged.

So how does all of this pertain to the use of software in your infrastructure or in the cloud? For applications where PII is not required as part of use of the platform, it is recommended to employ data masking for user credentials associated with access to the software; and in scenarios where email addresses are needed, that group distribution lists or associated masked email addresses are leveraged. This is so that in the event of a data breach, there is no direct PII available in that system and the information would be unintelligible as it would require access to additional systems to correlate back to an individual.

Of course, that is easier said than done, but again considering the severity of non-compliance the associated work of limiting exposure by employing data masking is a small price to pay that will benefit your organization in the long run.

Nick Turner is Director, IT Operations, at Zenoss

The Latest

July 11, 2018

How much are organizations investing in the shift to cloud native, how much is it getting them? ...

July 10, 2018

In the shift to cloud native, many organizations have adopted a configuration-as-code approach. This helps drive up application deployment velocity by letting developers and DevOps teams reconfigure their deployments as their needs arise. Other organizations, particularly the more regulated ones, still have security people owning these tools, but that creates increased pressure on the security organization to keep up. How much are organizations investing in this process, and how much is it getting them? ...

June 28, 2018

More than a third of companies that use serverless functions are not employing any application security best practices and are not using any tools or standard security methodologies to secure them, according to the State of Serverless Security survey, conducted by PureSec ...

June 27, 2018

The popularity of social media platforms and applications is spurring enterprises to adopt "social business" models to better engage with employees and customers and improve collaboration, according to a new study published by ISG ...

June 25, 2018

The previous chapter in this WhiteHat Security series discussed Codebase as the first step of the Twelve-Factor App and defined a security best practice approach for ensuring a secure source control system. Considering the importance of applying security in a modern DevOps world, this next chapter examines the security component of step two of the Twelve-Factor methodology. Here follows some actionable advice from the WhiteHat Security Addendum Checklist, which developers and ops engineers can follow during the SaaS build and operations stages ...

June 21, 2018

DevSecOps is quickly gaining support and traction, within and beyond information security teams. In fact, 70% of respondents believe their culture can embrace the change needed to fuse Security and DevOps, according to a new survey of 80 security professionals by Aqua Security ...

June 20, 2018

The larger the company size, the higher the proportion of low IT performers, according to the State of DevOps: Market Segmentation Report from Puppet, based on the 2017 State of DevOps Survey data ...

June 18, 2018

An overwhelming 83 percent of respondents have concerns about deploying traditional firewalls in the cloud, according to Firewalls and the Cloud, a survey conducted by Barracuda Networks...

June 14, 2018

Despite the vast majority of cloud management decision-makers believing that DevOps and microservice enablement are important, very few believe that their organizations are capable of delivering them today — a gap that is costing the average enterprise $34 million per year, according to new report from the Ponemon Institute ...

June 12, 2018

Dev teams are doing their best to give the customers what they want, but oftentimes find themselves in between a rock and a hard place. Teams are struggling to get up to speed with new tools that are meant to make their lives easier and more realistic to hit deadlines. With spring cleaning season upon us, take time this season to tune up agile processes and continue the work of advancing the shift towards DevOps ...

Share this