Your Dev Team is Spending Too Much Time on Internal Apps
February 22, 2022

Chris Smith

Internal tools — custom software built to support the business operations and used primarily by employees — are essential for managing complex internal processes that any company, from a small startup to a FAANG, relies on to operate day-to-day. Internal tools can make these processes more efficient within and between teams, and, when done right, save engineers time and resources. Retool's recent State of Internal Tools 2021 report found that developers dedicate more than 30 percent of their time to the process of internal app building.

The Big Drain on Developers' Time

While internal apps are highly valuable, build time must be taken into consideration. Internal tools can take up precious developer hours that should be spent on product development, which is the primary driver of a company's bottom line.

Survey data from the report suggests that, since the start of the pandemic, approximately 87% of developers are either spending the same amount of time or more building internal apps than they do on product development. In fact, 77 percent of surveyed companies with more than 500 employees reported having dedicated internal app teams.

What Methods Are Dev Teams Using?

To create internal apps, developers have adopted a few approaches. Developers surveyed for the report were asked which processes they typically use for building internal apps. In addition, they were asked about performance quality, user satisfaction, and loyalty (whether or not they plan to use the same method in the future) for each of those systems. We've shared their feedback here:

Custom-Built Solutions: Custom-built solutions ranked highest as the most common method for building internal apps. 81 percent of developers believe that custom-built solutions meet their needs. Nearly two in three respondents across virtually every industry stated that they use fully-customized systems, making this the most frequently utilized approach. That said, only six percent of developers that use custom-built solutions plan to continue using this method in the future.

Spreadsheet Applications: The second most common way to build internal apps is to use spreadsheet applications. However, this method garnered the lowest score for developer experience, with only 43 percent of users saying it meets their needs.

Low/No Code Platforms: Low and no code platforms ranked third in popularity with approximately 40 percent of developers identifying these systems as their preferred approach to internal app building. Within the subset of low-code users, 88 percent stated that they intend to continue using such platforms in the future, suggesting that it's highly effective.

Business Intelligence (BI) and Visualization Tools: Coming in fourth in popularity for building internal apps are BI and visualization tools. 71 percent of BI and visualization users surveyed plan to continue using this method in the future. Developers also identified and ranked their preferred tools including Tableau, PowerBI, Google Data Studio, and more.

Backend Admin Libraries: Backend admin libraries use backend frameworks as a foundation on which to build internal apps relatively easily. While they are the least common method for building internal apps, the overall sentiment around performance and user satisfaction was positive.

Unhappy Engineering Teams, Unclear Business Results

More than half of developers surveyed reported not having adequate time to complete internal app projects. Furthermore, they report that project management in internal app development is not efficient or clear. This is evident in the 33 percent of developers who stated that internal app building doesn't make a positive impact on company goals or bottom lines.

Additionally, 27 percent of developers don't have clarity on team structure in internal app projects, particularly regarding lines of ownership. These inefficiencies, communication issues, and excessive time spent building and maintaining internal apps have resulted in developers dedicating only around 70% of their time to revenue-producing work. That 70% is also inevitably impacted by stress that is carried over from developers being stretched too thin, making for unhappy developer teams.

How Can Developers Reclaim This Time?

There are pros and cons to all of the aforementioned approaches to internal app building. While most of these practices offer home-grown flexibility, they also can require significant time and resources to set up and be expensive to maintain. Developer teams should assess where home-grown vs. specialized, quick-to-implement tools make more sense to utilize. According to developers surveyed, a key issue is maintaining customizability while still making processes more efficient, and many find that low-code tools are an effective option.

As developers continue to improve upon existing processes, we'll certainly see new and even faster approaches to internal app development in the future, freeing up more developer time. This will lead to a better environment for dev teams, and internal apps with a lighter footprint on company resources.

Chris Smith is Developer Evangelist at Retool
Share this

Industry News

March 30, 2023

CloudBees announced the integration of CloudBees’ continuous delivery and release orchestration solution, CloudBees CD/RO, with Argo Rollouts.

March 30, 2023, a Mirantis company, announced that its fully-managed application delivery platform is available in AWS Marketplace.

March 30, 2023

env0 secured an additional $18.1 million of funding to conclude its Series A investment round with a total of $35.1 million.

March 29, 2023

Planview announced a new strategic collaboration with UiPath. The integration is designed to fuse the UiPath Business Automation Platform with the Planview Value Stream Management (VSM) solution Planview® Tasktop Hub.

March 29, 2023

Noname Security announced major enhancements to its API security platform to help organizations protect their API ecosystem, secure their applications, and increase cyber resilience.

March 28, 2023

Mirantis announced the latest version of Mirantis Container Cloud -- MCC 2.23 -- that simplifies operations with the ability to monitor applications performance with a new Grafana dashboard and to make updates to Kubernetes clusters with a one-click “upgrade” button from a web interface.

March 28, 2023

Pegasystems announced updates to Pega Cloud supported by an enhanced Global Operations Center to deliver a more scalable, reliable, and secure foundation for its suite of AI-powered decisioning and workflow automation solutions.

March 28, 2023

D2iQ announced the launch of DKP Gov, a new container-management solution optimized for deployment within the government sector.

March 28, 2023

StackHawk announced the availability of StackHawk Pro and StackHawk Enterprise for trial and purchase through the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Marketplace.

March 27, 2023

Octopus Deploy announced the results KinderSystems has seen working with Octopus. Through the use of Octopus, KinderSystems automates its software deployment processes to meet the complex needs of its customers and reduce the time to deploy software.

March 27, 2023

Elastic Path announced Integrations Hub, a library of instant-on, no-code integrations that are fully managed and hosted by Elastic Path.

March 27, 2023

Yugabyte announced key updates to YugabyteDB Managed, including the launch of the YugabyteDB Managed Command Line Interface (CLI).

March 23, 2023

Ambassador Labs released Telepresence for Docker, designed to make it easy for developer teams to build, test and deliver apps at scale across Kubernetes.

March 23, 2023

Fermyon Technologies introduced Spin 1.0, a major new release of the serverless functions framework based on WebAssembly.

March 23, 2023

Torc announced the acquisition of coding performance measurement application Codealike to empower software developers with even more data that increases skills, job opportunities and enterprise value.