Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 4
A blog series by WhiteHat Security
September 12, 2018

Eric Sheridan
WhiteHat Security

The previous chapter in this WhiteHat Security series examined the security component of step three of the Twelve-Factor methodology — storing config in the environment — with a key focus on the importance of auditing the environment when externalizing. This means identifying and applying hardening guidelines to the environment, and taking the opportunity to leverage a third party security team to assess the environment.

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 1

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 2

Start with Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 3

This next blog examines the security component of step four of the Twelve-Factor methodology — backing services. Here follows some actionable advice from the WhiteHat Security Addendum Checklist, which developers and ops engineers can follow during the SaaS build and operations stages.

Defining Backing Services in the Twelve-Factor App

The fourth factor of the Twelve-Factor methodology advises treating backing services as attached resources. It describes backing services as anything that’s outside of your app that may be treated as a resource, for example datastores, messaging/queuing systems, SMTP services for outbound email and caching services.

According to Twelve-Factor, backing services like the database are traditionally managed by the same systems administrators as the app’s runtime deploy. Additionally, the app may also have services provided and managed by third parties. What’s key here is that the code for a twelve-factor app makes no distinction between local and third party services. From the app’s point of view, both are attached resources, which means that a deploy of the twelve-factor app should be able to interchange a local MySQL database with one managed by a third party without any changes to the app’s code.

The rationale is that resources can be attached to and detached from deploys at will. Twelve-Factor shares this example: “If the app’s database is misbehaving due to a hardware issue, the app’s administrator might spin up a new database server restored from a recent backup. The current production database could be detached, and the new database attached — all without any code changes.”

Applying Security to Backing Services

Treating backing services as attached resources helps to encourage encapsulated development and smaller programs for example, but from a security perspective, backing services can also inadvertently encapsulate vulnerabilities.

It’s important to keep the following in mind:

1. You assume their risk

Understand the security posture of the backing service and write code as if it is being attacked, or is attacking you. This is important because at some point in the application’s normal business operation, it will either send or receive sensitive data from the backing service.

If the backing service contains a vulnerability that is exploited, this means that the application’s sensitive data (including customer data) is subject to exposure. Even though you may not have written or built that backing service, ultimately the responsibility is still yours should it be exploited.

2. Secure your communications

Establish all connections using Transport Layer Security (TLS), a cryptographic protocol that provides communications security over a computer network. Authenticate to the backing service using a least privileged account i.e. an account that has only the minimum set of permissions or privileges necessary for it to complete its task.

For example, consider iOS or Android-based mobile devices. When logging into these devices, using a pin number, we are usually logging in with a personal account, which has limited capabilities and permissions. More specifically, it’s not possible to obtain system level privileges on iOS or Android devices. unless we jailbreak those devices. Apple and Google designed these products so that the users (as well as the applications) have enough capabilities to carry out basic tasks but restrict the ability of the user to perform system level tasks.

This analogy is similar to backing services. When we connect and authenticate to a backing service, we are using an account that has just enough permission to carry out the functionality that the application needs. As an example, assume the application needs to connect to a Postgres database. The solution involves creating a separate Postgres account for the application with only the necessary privileges.

3. Resource security abstraction

Encapsulate security checks within the Resource abstraction, and limit the need for users of the Resource abstraction to be security aware.

Read Security and the Twelve-Factor App - Step 5

Eric Sheridan is Chief Scientist at WhiteHat Security

The Latest

November 15, 2018

Serverless infrastructure environments are set to become the dominant paradigm for enterprise technology deployments, according to a new report — Why the Fuss About Serverless? — released by Leading Edge Forum ...

November 14, 2018

What to automate? Which parts of the delivery process are good candidates? Which applications will benefit from automation? At first, those sound like silly questions. Automate all your repetitive processes. If you think that you'll do the same thing manually more than once, automate it. Why would you waste your creative potential and knowledge by doing things that are much better done by scripts? Yet, an average company does not adhere to that logic. Why is that? ...

November 13, 2018

I'd love to see more security automation deeply integrated into the development process. Everybody knows since the 1990s that security as an afterthought just doesn't work, yet we keep doing it. The reason, I think, is because it's very hard to automate security ...

November 09, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 5, the final installment, covers deployment and production ...

November 08, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 4 is all about security ...

November 07, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 3 covers the development environment and the infrastructure ...

November 06, 2018

DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 2 covers the coding process ...

November 05, 2018

Everyone talks about automating the software development lifecycle (SDLC) but the first question should be: What should you automate? With this question in mind, DEVOPSdigest asked experts from across the IT industry for their opinions on what steps in the SDLC should be automated. Part 1 starts with by-far the most popular recommendation: Testing ...

October 31, 2018

Halloween is a time for all things spooky, but not when it comes to your mobile app experience. A poor experience can not only scare off your customers but keep them away for good ...

October 30, 2018

As organizations have embraced open source, they have become polyglot — using multiple programming languages and technology stacks to accomplish software and hardware related tasks. Enterprises are caught between the benefits provided by a polyglot environment and the complexities and challenges these environments bring. Ultimately, if the situation remains unchecked, polyglot will kill your enterprise ...

Share this