Maturity Metrics - Charting Your DevOps Progress
December 09, 2015

Aruna Ravichandran
CA Technologies

The application of maturity metrics to everything that we do in today's business environment frequently creates the requirement to perform difficult, far-reaching calculations.

It's not necessarily those measurements that span huge sets of complex data that present the most challenging prospects. Often, it's a compilation of those metrics that attempt to analyze the advancement of fuzzier, process-oriented initiatives that can leave one grasping for just the right analysis methods.

Attempting to weigh the current level of DevOps maturity within your organization is precisely one of those daunting propositions that can leave today's business and technology pros searching for meaningful answers.

Sure, there are some well-established metrics that can serve as inherent measurements of overall DevOps success, including deployment frequency rates, average lead times, meant time to recovery (MTTR), and of course, any figures resulting from dedicated Application Performance Monitoring (APM).

Yet, perhaps even more valuable than some of these numbers, or of greater import to practitioners for purposes of self-assessment, are metrics that help analyze precisely how ongoing DevOps adoption compares to similar efforts among peers.

At the end of the day, widely touted unicorns can publicize stunning evidence of their agile transformations, driven by DevOps methodologies; yet, for most organizations this is a long-term, iterative process aided greatly by some understanding of how they compare to less revolutionary examples.

After all, getting a feel for where you're ahead of the curve or behind the 8-ball might be just the thing to help DevOps-oriented teams offer evidence of progress, or the need for increased investment, the next time management comes looking for answers.

For instance, related to development, perhaps your teams are already actively tracking feature request lead times; but is there an agreement between business, dev and ops regarding the performance of critical services (transaction counts, performance, uptime, etc.) necessary to meet pre-defined business goals?

In the deployment arena, you likely have systems in place to note changes in frequency; however, does your organizational structure and tooling support cross-functional teams that put greater emphasis on the processes associated with releasing new capabilities, rather than supporting individual roles?

As far as management is concerned, you're probably employing APM to ensure improved visibility, response, uptime and availability. That said, is your monitoring able to distinguish the most critical and recurrent problems, and how they impact business services – without necessitating lengthy configuration and base-lining?

Aruna Ravichandran is VP, Product & Solutions Marketing, DevOps, CA Technologies

The Latest

January 22, 2019

In 2019, competitive disruption will drive remaining laggards to a DevOps boiling point. As the industry moves to the plateau of productivity with DevOps automation and standard tooling, laggard executives will reach a management crisis point that will force actions ...

January 17, 2019

To better align business and IT objectives, enterprise organizations should focus on the core "problems" that individual business units face today in driving out real consumer value. Until the roadblocks and inhibitors — and, ultimately, the resultant technical debt — are removed from the equation, large enterprise organizations will continue struggling to succeed ...

January 16, 2019

Technical debt is what results when legacy platforms or highly integrated and dependent systems and processes inhibit large enterprise organizations from meeting the needs of internal business stakeholders. In many cases, the core objectives that drive real, monetizable business value are not aligned to the esoteric IT goals of "automation" and "Agile development." This creates a fundamental disconnect between business and IT ...

January 14, 2019

Budget season is an important time of the year for businesses because it gives senior IT and security leaders time to reflect on what went right this year and what initiatives need to be given priority in the new year. Recent research from Threat Stack shows security budgets are expected to increase by 19 percent over the next two years, but business leaders are still facing challenges determining where to allocate this budget in the face of rapidly evolving infrastructure ...

January 10, 2019

As organizations of all sizes are embracing hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures, they are experiencing the many benefits of a more agile, distributed and high-speed environment where new applications and services can be built and delivered in days and weeks, rather than months and years. But as the adoption of these next generation architectures continues to grow, so do the complexities of securing the cloud workloads running on them ...

January 09, 2019

DEVOPSdigest invited DevOps experts for their predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 9, the final installment, covers microservices, containers and APIs ...

January 08, 2019

DEVOPSdigest invited DevOps experts for their predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 8, covers microservices and containers ...

January 07, 2019

DEVOPSdigest invited DevOps experts for their predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 7, covers the Cloud ...

December 20, 2018

DEVOPSdigest invited DevOps experts for their predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 6, covers DevOps Analytics, including AI and Machine Learning ...

December 19, 2018

DEVOPSdigest invited DevOps experts for their predictions on how DevOps and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2019. Part 5 is all about testing ...

Share this