There are many options when it comes to container orchestration platforms and services. Figuring out which one is best for a particular organization’s needs and applications can be a challenge. Which platform for containerization you choose can significantly influence your business success, so the selection process should be carefully considered ...
Application Program Interfaces (API’s) represent an effective way to build and manage mobile services. By using APIs — a set of routines, protocols and tools for building software applications — application developers no longer have to buy technology software or hardware. Instead, they can simply plug into a growing open ecosystem of API-driven services. It is simple to integrate, and saves time and money for new developers.
There are countless mobile API-based services. From authentication, ads and payment APIs to price comparison and reporting API based services. The availability of these APIs made mobile app development much simpler, but this simplicity comes with a price.
Unlike images, game assets, videos and other type of static content, APIs are dynamic in nature and their content cannot be cached at the edge of the internet to increase download speed. Often times the result of an API call is customized per user profile, its location and the activity he/she is trying to accomplish. A user searching for a Mexican restaurant in downtown San Francisco will get a unique (non cacheable) search result.
There are three main challenges with existing API configurations that directly impact any mobile app performance:
Since API responses are usually personalized, its content cannot be cached by the CDN. Some of the responses could be sizeable and include dozens of images that will have to be downloaded on a slow mobile connection. This impacts the API response time and eventually the mobile app.
Mobile networks are less reliable than wired networks with Packet Loss and error rates that are 10-20 times higher. This affects not only the app API response time but most importantly its failure rates. Mobile developers have to factor into their code fail conditions and a proper way to handle each one of them, which can complicate things.
There are two sources for high server load: (A) Failed transactions due to network error will usually follow by API call retry, keeping the server busier than it should be; and (B) API calls over slow connections means that the server has to keep connections open longer, consuming more resources than needed.
How could mobile developers mitigate the risk when using APIs?
While caching is not possible, one could accelerate an API call using a few techniques:
■ Protocol Optimization: By avoiding slow starts, backoffs and other TCP hiccups, downloading a sizeable API response could become faster. Traditional CDNs offer such an optimization in the middle mile for a premium price.
■ Routing Optimization: Speeding up access to the origin server API can be achieved through better routing of the request/response in the first and middle miles. Traditional CDNs can offer this for a premium price.
■ Persistent Connections: To avoid the “TCP handshake” overhead one could keep the connection open/warm and save a few round trips for each new request. This technique should be used carefully since overusing it will once again increase server load.
Unfortunately, since all the above techniques take place in a wired network (as opposed to the wireless link) the performance impact is marginally low while the cost (to various vendors) is not.
Most importantly, none of these techniques can be technically integrated with 3rd party APIs, unless the vendor operating the service is cooperating.